Offenders behind a blue wall

In the name of Justice, to Protect and Serve. What do you do when justice is perverted by a criminal personality in a uniform, carrying a gun purchased by the public they ostensibly serve? As it turns out, The Aims of the Criminal Law are more divergent than it would appear from statute alone.

Windsor Police Service Constable Michael Rettig

Particulars

Remarks

Narrative

2011
Place holder
Place holder.
2012
Place holder
Place holder.
May 11, 2012
CP/GO 2012-27287 - Place holder
At the time of the occurrence, Constable Rettig was partnered with Constable Luke Harmon.
Place holder.
2012
Place holder
Place holder.
August 18, 2012
Burn it down
At the time of the occurrence, Constable Rettig was not present.
See: Paul Kevin Harper.
October 3, 2012
I'll take care of you if the Judge won't
At the time of the occurrence, Constable Rettig was not present.
See: Paul Kevin Harper.
October 3, 2012
CP 2012-62374 - Vigilante justice
At the time of the occurrence, Constable Rettig was not present. He responded to it.
Place holder.
See: Paul Kevin Harper.
October 3, 2012
CP 2012-62374 - The pseudologist begins a yarn
21. Parties to offence of
  Uttering threats
  Assault
  Attempted Mischief
  Intimidation of a justice system participant
by knowingly
  128.(a) Misconduct of officers executing process
  128.(b) Misconduct of officers executing process
  Intimidation of a justice system participant
  Obstruction
Place holder.
October 3, 2012
CP 2012-62374 - See you later
At the time of the occurrence, Constable Rettig was not present.
See: Paul Kevin Harper.
October 3, 2012
CP 2012-62374 - Tough shit, you're on a list
At the time of the occurrence, Constable Rettig was not present.
See: Constable Robert Brisco, Constable David Liu.
2012
Place holder
Place holder.
September 26, 2016
Formal notice

Written notice hand delivered to the individual's negligent institution, as defined by §22.1(b) of the Canadian Criminal Code1. The portion constituting a formal notice under the Tresspass to Property Act lawfully prohibits entry onto property owned, controlled, or occupied by the authors. A second portion, dealing with the common law, prohibits entry or communication for any purpose. It makes clear that the presumption at §3.(2) of the Act is invalid.

1See: Constable Jon-Michael Woods, CP 2011-40363 (July 12, 2011), for the first instance of confirmation in Police records.