Offenders behind a blue wall

In the name of Justice, to Protect and Serve. What do you do when justice is perverted by a criminal personality in a uniform, carrying a gun purchased by the public they ostensibly serve? As it turns out, The Aims of the Criminal Law are more divergent than it would appear from statute alone.

Windsor Police Service Constable Marcel Sarkis

Particulars

Remarks

Narrative

Place holder
Place holder
Place holder.
July 12, 2011
CP 2011-40363 - If at first you don't succeed, shit on it
At the time of the occurrence, Constable Sarkis was partnered with Constable Jon-Michael Woods. Attendance per Superintendent Langlois.
Your letter went all the way to the top. All the way. Constable Jon-Michael Woods, July 12, 2011
Place holder.
August 24, 2013
CP/GO 2013-61701 - Hello, Police? We have a problem. They're still breathing.
At the time of the occurrence, Constable Sarkis was partnered with unnamed witness for the Crown Kenneth Burt.
21. Parties to offence / 23. Accessory after the fact to
  423.1 Intimidation of a justice system participant or a journalist / 140. Public mischief
  Place holder.
by knowingly
  Intentionally negligent investigation
  Malicious prosecution
  128.(a) Misconduct of officers executing process / 122. Breach of trust by public officer
  128.(b) Misconduct of officers executing process / 137. Fabricating evidence
  139. Obstructing justice
  Place holder.
219.(1)(a) Criminal negligence
219.(1)(b) Criminal negligence
September 10, 2013
Precognitive victim prevention
See: WPS Patti Kelly (re: August 24, 2013 - GO 2013-61701)
September 16, 2013
CP/GO 2013-68255 - We're from the government and we're here to help
See: WPS Patti Kelly (re: September 10, 2013)
September 19, 2013
Ontario Superior Court - Correcting an intentional mistake made by a misplaced green sash
See: Place holder.
September 25, 2013
Ontario Superior Court - Correction seems to make Walter Costa very angry, this is personal for the public interest
See: Place holder.
September 26, 2016
Formal notice

Written notice hand delivered to the individual's negligent institution, as defined by §22.1(b) of the Canadian Criminal Code1. The portion constituting a formal notice under the Tresspass to Property Act lawfully prohibits entry onto property owned, controlled, or occupied by the authors. A second portion, dealing with the common law, prohibits entry or communication for any purpose. It makes clear that the presumption at §3.(2) of the Act is invalid.

1See: Constable Jon-Michael Woods, CP 2011-40363 (July 12, 2011), for the first instance of confirmation in Police records.